<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Are You a Good Developer or a Bad Developer?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://virtuocity.com/2006/11/22/are-you-a-good-developer-or-a-bad-developer/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://virtuocity.com/2006/11/22/are-you-a-good-developer-or-a-bad-developer/</link>
	<description>Planning and Managing Human-Friendly Development and Growth</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 02:19:53 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Isabel</title>
		<link>http://virtuocity.com/2006/11/22/are-you-a-good-developer-or-a-bad-developer/comment-page-1/#comment-13</link>
		<dc:creator>Isabel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Nov 2006 17:42:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://virtuocity.com/2006/11/22/are-you-a-good-developer-or-a-bad-developer/#comment-13</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the pointer! Of course, you're quite right that there's far more at work for developers than the issue of community contribution, but I think that Perica's point was that 'good' developers are differentiated from 'bad' ones by their concern for the project's community integration. The definition here has more to do with a developer's public reputation as 'good' or 'bad;' I apologize if the title was misleading.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the pointer! Of course, you&#8217;re quite right that there&#8217;s far more at work for developers than the issue of community contribution, but I think that Perica&#8217;s point was that &#8216;good&#8217; developers are differentiated from &#8216;bad&#8217; ones by their concern for the project&#8217;s community integration. The definition here has more to do with a developer&#8217;s public reputation as &#8216;good&#8217; or &#8216;bad;&#8217; I apologize if the title was misleading.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard Layman</title>
		<link>http://virtuocity.com/2006/11/22/are-you-a-good-developer-or-a-bad-developer/comment-page-1/#comment-7</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Layman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Nov 2006 14:23:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://virtuocity.com/2006/11/22/are-you-a-good-developer-or-a-bad-developer/#comment-7</guid>
		<description>Umm, you really need to read &lt;a href="http://nw-ar.com/face/molotch.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;City as a Growth Machine: Toward a Political Economy of Place&lt;/a&gt;" by Harvey Molotch.  

The average developer will "contribute" to social and community concerns to the extent that marginal returns are still revenue positive...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Umm, you really need to read <a href="http://nw-ar.com/face/molotch.html" rel="nofollow">City as a Growth Machine: Toward a Political Economy of Place</a>&#8221; by Harvey Molotch.  </p>
<p>The average developer will &#8220;contribute&#8221; to social and community concerns to the extent that marginal returns are still revenue positive&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

